tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post113394770940962445..comments2023-10-30T17:07:19.996+05:30Comments on Don't trust the Indian Media!: Trustworthy reporting.Khttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06885651813993966354noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-30848671177950196742009-10-06T22:15:50.535+05:302009-10-06T22:15:50.535+05:30I'll just say you'r righty rightI'll just say you'r righty rightMagazine Ecommercehttp://www.magazine-ecommerce.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-77298526754153073382006-11-26T16:39:00.000+05:302006-11-26T16:39:00.000+05:30Inresponse to a request above, here is Nabanita Du...Inresponse to a request above, here is Nabanita Dutt <br /><br />http://www.thingsasian.com/contributor/nduttAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1135338440480985292005-12-23T17:17:00.000+05:302005-12-23T17:17:00.000+05:30I don't know why so much interest. Vir sanghvi is ...I don't know why so much interest. Vir sanghvi is a fat pompous ass who has expensive wines and foreign holidays on company cash and imagines he is very appealing. It is a shame that we Indians are strill so taken by cheap displays of sophistication. I don't know about his relations with his ex-wife but he is indeed a much married man. Everybody in HT Kolkata office here know that, since some of us were invited to the wedding. I wasn't of course but we have seen pictures taken by our guys. These two have been going around for years, so what's the big deal? And who cares? K your blogs are great by the way. Give us more TOI gossip. We hear no real Mumbai media gossip here in KolkataAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1135241003219484392005-12-22T14:13:00.000+05:302005-12-22T14:13:00.000+05:30that is all bloddy shit... Vir Sanghvi and Malavik...that is all bloddy shit... Vir Sanghvi and Malavika Sanghvi are seperated but get on pretty well.. Vir Sanghvi is not married again. Confirmed Source.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1134332669161837962005-12-12T01:54:00.000+05:302005-12-12T01:54:00.000+05:30I read in connection with Malvika Sanghvi somewher...I read in connection with Malvika Sanghvi somewhere here that Hindustan Times Editor Vir Sanghvi has got married again to some gorgeous younger woman. Is it tru???????? Who is this Nabanita Dutt? I have not seen her name in HT? Does she write only from Kolkatta? Please!!!! Want to see her photo. Badly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1134315036930778242005-12-11T21:00:00.000+05:302005-12-11T21:00:00.000+05:304WD: K is a dude in business journalism, well-know...4WD: K is a dude in business journalism, well-known to thousands of people.<BR/>K: You seem to have misinterpreted the (rather senior little) birdie who told you about Businessweek. BW is CLOSING DOWN its Asian edition not winding down their Asian operations.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13441809988487585009noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1134110516173575712005-12-09T12:11:00.000+05:302005-12-09T12:11:00.000+05:30You know, i did a story once that got followed by ...You know, i did a story once that got followed by the dawn and jung, in Pakistan. They both quoted the story saying , The *paper's name* reports that .. <BR/><BR/>kinda cool. makes you feel good even. My friend's reports got written about in Mid Day in bbay a few times though, quoting even the name of the reporter. <BR/><BR/>k, what do you write about? Business? You seem to know a fair bit about business things.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13441809988487585009noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1133953119238382792005-12-07T16:28:00.000+05:302005-12-07T16:28:00.000+05:30Don't get me started - Aniel Matherani's interview...Don't get me started - Aniel Matherani's interview to a 'weekly'(similar to the RG interview) according to most papers on Day 1 - only the ToI carried the name India Today the next day. HT of course, buried its head in the sand and hoped the matter would die down.Khttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06885651813993966354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9917432.post-1133949846191712942005-12-07T15:34:00.000+05:302005-12-07T15:34:00.000+05:30You'll remain stuck with the name of your blog, fo...You'll remain stuck with the name of your blog, for a loooooooooong time. <BR/><BR/>Our media also doesn't ever give due credit to their competitors. Bhaichand Patel says:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://outlookindia.com/diary.asp?fodname=20051010&authorname=Bhaichand+Patel&subsubsecname=Delhi" REL="nofollow">Rahul Gandhi’s indiscreet interview, if there was such an interview, created quite a stir. I was interested in knowing where the interview had appeared but the newspapers only mentioned that it was in "a weekly". Now, which weekly was it? It took me several days to figure it out since I don’t subscribe to Tehelka. <BR/><BR/>This morning’s Asian Age informs me that Greg Chappell’s e-mail to bcci president on Saurav Ganguly was leaked "to a Kolkata newpaper". Which newspaper? I am clueless. <BR/><BR/>Why are our papers so bashful when it comes to identifying a rival by name? Here is a recent New York Times headline: "Los Angeles Times takes 5 Pulitzer Prizes". Times of India would not have the grace to report on any prizes picked up by Hindustan Times and vice versa. The competition is mentioned by name only when circulation figures are trumpeted. The big loser is The Indian Express which specialises in exposing skulduggery in high places. Its scoops are invariably picked up by others the following day. But you will not find a word on where the story originated. This is petty. And the papers are denying information to their readers.</A><BR/><BR/>Excuse the deviation from the point, but everything seems linked.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13441809988487585009noreply@blogger.com